[Hackrf-dev] FW: deaf HackRF
Stephen
refsmmat at gmail.com
Mon Jan 19 15:25:09 EST 2015
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the reply.
The RX sensitivity figure I quoted is dBm – ‘Decibels above a MilliWatt’. -95dBm is 95 db below a MilliWatt, wheras -127dBm is 127 db below a MilliWatt.
This test was conducted with an RF signal generator.
Regarding the test, to register minimum scale on the SDR# spectrum, the HackRF required -95dBm , the RTL2832 required only -127dBm.
Expressing this as microvolts instead of dBm, the equivalent level in microvolts (to register the same scale on SDR#) are:
0.1uV for the RTL2832
3.5uV for the hack RF
Accordingly, The HackRF requires considerably more signal to register the same scale on SDR#.
I discovered this performance limitation when I attempted to try to receive NOAA weather satellites, I found HackRF barely registered, wheras the RTL2832 registered a strong signal for the same satellite pass on the same antenna.
I appreciate you are trying to help & I don’t mean to be rude by contradicting you, but the HackRF I have is definitely ‘deaf’.
Regards,
Stephen
From: Tom Buelens [mailto:tom.buelens at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 19 January 2015 8:23 PM
To: Stephen
Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] deaf HackRF
Hi Stephen,
I might be mistaken but I actually think the numbers you mention show that the HackRF is better at receiving the signal.
You see, an attenuation of -105 dBm is resulting in a smaller signal then -69dBm. Please also see here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBm
Cheers,
Tom
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Stephen <refsmmat at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Ive just bought a HackRF, but I have found RF performance is poor. Compared to a $12 USB RTL2832 SDR, it is deaf by about 32-36dB.
The tests were done with an HP 8922 test set & an unmodulated carrier at 137.5MHz. The test was the generated RF signal required for both devices to achieve the same scale level in SDR#.
RTL SDR HackRF Difference
Scale1 -127dBm -95dBm 32dB
Scale2 -115dBm -79dBm 36dB
Scale3 -105dBm -69dBm 36dB
The tests were done with max gain on both devices, but with the HackRF AMP off.
I have seen from posts that others have had this problem – related soldering of RF switches in the manufacturing process.
Can anyone provide further details on the fix or suggest a resolution please?
Thanks,
Stephen
_______________________________________________
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev at greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/hackrf-dev/attachments/20150120/9bfc0dd9/attachment.html>
More information about the HackRF-dev
mailing list