[Hackrf-dev] Fwd: HackRF for preliminary FCC home test?

Sergey Ivanov ivanov1024 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 4 16:55:24 EDT 2017


Thank you Chuck!

I'll check this out. What do you mean by a radio stack?
For now my plan is to use pre-certified modules so that my board will be
certified as an unintentional radiator, which is thousands of $.
But I still need to prove that the board doesn't emit Electro Magnetic
Field above allowed.


On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 at 23:35, Chuck McManis <chuck.mcmanis at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am not sure exactly what you are asking.
>
> If you want to get FCC certification for your device, there is a process
> it is documented at the FCC web site here:
>
> https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/laboratory-division/general/equipment-authorization
>
> That pretty much outlines the steps. If you are using a manufacturer
> supplied radio stack you may be able to leverage their certification but if
> you wrote your own stack you will need to do the authorization
> independently. There are a number of consultancies in the US who will
> handle the process for you (for a fee of course). A long time ago (2006) I
> was on a project that needed such certification and the vendor hired
> charged $50,000 and it took four months to complete. They did all the
> required paperwork and followed up on all of the questions the FCC had,
> they also flew out an engineer to an FCC certified test facility to get the
> verification tests done. (I live in the San Francisco bay area and the FCC
> testing facilities around here are typically reserved months, if not years,
> in advance it seems).
>
> --Chuck
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Sergey Ivanov <ivanov1024 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Is there someone who did this or similar task before?
>> Any specific suggestions?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4 August 2017 at 21:57, Andrew Rich <vk4tec at internode.on.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You can do what ever you like as long as you understand the rules for a
>>> licence and GNU Radio
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 Aug 2017, at 4:26 am, Sergey Ivanov <ivanov1024 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All!
>>>
>>> I have a product which uses nRF24L01+  2.4 GHz modules for
>>> communication. Now we have plans to go to North America market, and I
>>> am not sure if my Chinese nRF modules can pass FCC test. If they can't,
>>> then I need to re-design my PCB (now I use 2 layers logic board and nRF on
>>> a socket).
>>>
>>> Can I use HackRF to imitate FCC test on my workbench?
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HackRF-dev mailing list
>>> HackRF-dev at greatscottgadgets.com
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Sergey Ivanov
>> +7 910 424 9895 <+7%20910%20424-98-95>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HackRF-dev mailing list
>> HackRF-dev at greatscottgadgets.com
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>>
>>
> --
Best Regards,

Sergey Ivanov
+7 910 424 9895
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/hackrf-dev/attachments/20170804/e0215074/attachment.html>


More information about the HackRF-dev mailing list