[IPAC-List] Ricci v DeStefano and the Relevant Labor Market
Eric Palmer
epalmer613 at yahoo.com
Fri Jul 3 19:16:18 EDT 2009
Ron's point is correct, but recall that the underrepresentation at the fire fighter rank in New Haven doesn't appear to be great. The primary underrepresentation is at the officer level, where the paramount requirements are leadership, management skills, analytical/probelm solving skills, and of course expertise in the tactical, technical, and strategic elements of fire science. I think we have to ask what the relavant labor pool is for the officer level? Given the above requirements, it seems to be pretty restrictive. Assuming it's an internal only promotional opportunity, is the relevant labor pool those New Haven fire fighters (Engineers, really) who are strong in leadership, management skills, and problem solving? That's more restrictive still.
--- On Thu, 7/2/09, RPClare at aol.com <RPClare at aol.com> wrote:
From: RPClare at aol.com <RPClare at aol.com>
Subject: Re: [IPAC-List] Ricci v DeStefano and the Relevant Labor Market
To: richard.arwood at comcast.net, IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
Date: Thursday, July 2, 2009, 3:21 PM
Didn't we have a landmark case about the validity of education
requirements!?! The labor pool point is an excellent one but its application to
firefighters is a slippery slope requiring other validation efforts. It is much
easier when we're talking about engineers, lawyers and MDs than when we're
talking about defending the requirement for a HS diploma (or age
restricrtions).
In a message dated 7/2/2009 5:37:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
richard.arwood at comcast.net writes:
If I may do so, please allow me to make a clear point here that the
important issue regarding over-representation and under-representation is
very often (almost always) misinterpreted to be the "general population."
It is very sad that most politicians and many selection professionals may
err in that manner. The true standard must be the "relevant population"
(those who meet or exceed the minimal requirements (usually at entry level)
for the job. I would suspect that the "relevant labor market" in the New
Haven zone of employee recruitment is far different than the general
population, given the likelihood that firefighters must possess a level of
achieved prior education (i.e. high school or GED).
In most "consent decrees" that I have seen rendered by or through the
Department of Justice, the final goal of minority representation within the
employment group is the "relevant labor market"; thereby restoring the
employee group, in theory, to the percentage distribution that would likely
be found if no prior discrimination occurred.
Let me give a specific example from Memphis TN. The general population is
(approximately): 65% Black, 44% White, and 1% Hispanic. However, the
relevant labor market, in Memphis, for entry-level firefighters is: 38%
Black, 62% White, and <1% Hispanic. The entry-level requirement for
firefighter is: high school education (or equivalent), age 21-35. Thus,
one
can see the very dramatic differences rendered by an evaluation given with
the proper perspective.
Of course, personnel selection at levels beyond the entry level pose other
complex questions, but the "relevant population" percentage is an
interesting barometer to compare the final distribution of results of
testing and selection, and the distribution of race and gender within
employee groups.
................Richard
=======================================
Richard Arwood, Fire Chief (retired) -Memphis, TN
Collierville, TN
=======================================
_______________________________________________________
IPAC-List
IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list
**************Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the
grill. (http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood00000005)
_______________________________________________________
IPAC-List
IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list
More information about the IPAC-List
mailing list