[IPAC-List] Article alert

Mark Hammer Mark.Hammer at psc-cfp.gc.ca
Wed Sep 8 15:31:20 EDT 2010


if you just can't seem to get enough of Ricci vs Stefano,
the July issue of Public Administration Review has a
paper pertaining to it:

Damned If You Do and Damned If You Don’t: Title VII
and Public Employee Promotion Disparate Treatment and
Disparate Impact Litigation. R.N. Roberts.
Public Administration Review • July| August 2010,
pp. 582-590


Haven't read it yet, but here's the abstract:

What has been the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s
2009 decision in Ricci v. Destefano on the selection and
promotion practices of public employers? Relying solely
on circumstantial evidence, the Supreme Court held that
the Civil Service Board of New Haven, Connecticut, had
engaged in Title VII disparate treatment discrimination
by refusing to certify the results of a promotion
examination that led, in turn, to a disparate impact on
African American firefighters. To limit the discretion
of public employers to disregard such selection and
promotion exam results, the Ricci majority held that a
public employer must “have a strong basis in evidence
to believe it will be subject to disparate-impact liability
if it fails to the take the race-conscious discriminatory
action.” This article argues that the decision effectively
prohibits public employers from rejecting the results of
selection and promotion instruments, even though there
is evidence that screening instruments inequitably affect
protected groups. It also forces public employers to become
more careful in developing selection and promotion
examinations or face the possibility of costly Title VII
litigation.

I suspect that it doesn't cover any ground that is totally
unfamiliar to people here, but it's interesting insomuch as
it is directed to a public administration (rather than HR or
employment law) audience. I can pop you an e-copy (136k)
if you don't have access to it and are interested.
Drop me a PM.

Mark Hammer
Ottawa


>

This e-mail message is intended for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or
re-transmission is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient or not
authorized by the named recipient(s), or if you have received this
e-mail in error, then please notify the sender immediately and delete
the message and any copies.
>
Ce courriel est destiné exclusivement au destinataire mentionné en titre
et peut contenir de l'information privilégiée, confidentielle ou
soustraite à la communication aux termes des lois applicables. Toute
divulgation non autorisée, toute reproduction ou réacheminement est
interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce courriel, ou n'êtes
pas autorisé par le destinataire visé, ou encore, si vous l'avez reçu
par erreur, veuillez le mentionner immédiatement à l'expéditeur et
supprimer le courriel et les copies.



More information about the IPAC-List mailing list