[IPAC-List] Measurement education
Jeff Feuquay
jfeuquay at gmail.com
Thu Oct 25 15:27:54 EDT 2012
Hi, Steven,
You seem to have hit a nerve - more dicsussion than we've seen for awhile
on the ipac-list.
A few years ago, CPS sponsored a project where a large group of Fire
Chiefs, Fire HR, etc, from large and small jusidictions provided info
related to fire service leadership and selection. The survey results were
then verified by a group of 30 or so Chiefs at the Fire Rescue
International (IAFC) conference in Dallas. The report is attached. Don't
expect a lot of depth; it was written as a discussion piece to guide
selection folk and fire service leaders to concensus on what to look for,
and to lead to a competency-based approach. The study also ended up as an
article in Fire Rescue magazine - copy attached.
Hope it provides ideas.
Jeff
-----------------------------------------
Dr. Jeffrey P Feuquay, I/O Psychologist & Attorney
Director, Psychology-Law Center, LLC and
Special Counsel to Russell, Brown & Breckenridge, LLC
108 W. Walnut, PO Box 376, Nevada, MO 64772
ofc: 417-667-5076 fax: 417-667-3013
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Partain, Steven C. <Steven.Partain at tvfr.com
> wrote:
> Folks, I am facing a bit of a crisis of understanding related to
> measurement in promotional exams. Every-so-often we have a promotional
> exam in which the names and ranking of eligibles on the list don't match
> what our folks know about those candidates. We've had several recently
> with the "best" people failing the exams. As you might imagine, HR is to
> blame, and we are under great pressure to change our approach to exams to
> ensure the "best" people pass and are appropriately ranked. I won't go
> through all the practices we use to ensure validity, reliability,
> standardization, etc. We certainly are always looking at those factors and
> have room to improve. But the underlying message is to make our exams
> "more successful," which means that the resulting eligible list matches the
> perceptions of our workforce about their true ability.
>
> So, here's my question. I feel pretty well-versed in the folly of
> holistic assessments, the relatively low validity of others "sizing up"
> candidates intuitively, etc. I have attempted-and obviously failed-to
> convey some of the science underlying this. How have others successfully
> overcome this challenge? Are there metaphors that have worked? A written
> piece published that captures the issue in laymen's terms?
>
> Any help is appreciated. Otherwise, I fear we will head down the road of
> having the workforce rank candidates-kind of a popularity contest.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steven Partain
> HR Manager
> Human Resources
> Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue
> 11945 SW 70th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 97223
> www.tvfr.com<http://www.tvfr.com/>
> Ph. 503-259-1292
>
> _______________________________________________________
> IPAC-List
> IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
> http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list
>
More information about the IPAC-List
mailing list