[IPAC-List] Seeking copy of Test 21

[Dennis Doverspike]

Joel,

I just read through Gutman's book, the Supreme Court decisions, as well as
my own now declining memory related to the case - and all reach a
conclusion the opposite of yours. That is, if I am correct in my
interpretation of all three - they supported the use of Test 21. So Test 21
was not struck down, it was specifically found to be valid. From the SC
case,

   2. Statutory standards similar to those obtaining under Title VII were
   also satisfied here. The District Court's conclusion that Test 21 was
   directly related to the requirements of the police training program and
   that a positive relationship between the test and that program was
   sufficient to validate the test (wholly aside from its possible
   relationship to actual performance as a police officer) is fully supported
   on the record in this case, and no remand to establish further validation
   is appropriate. Pp. 248-252.




On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Joel Wiesen <
jwiesen at appliedpersonnelresearch.com> wrote:

> Test 21 was struck down in Washington v Davis in 1976.  (It had been used
> to select DC police officers.)
>
> The test was in the court record.
>
> I am seeking a copy of Test 21.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Joel
>
>
>
> --
> Joel P. Wiesen, Ph.D., Director
> Applied Personnel Research
> 62 Candlewood Road
> Scarsdale, NY 10583-6040
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelwiesen
> (617) 244-8859
> http://appliedpersonnelresearch.com
>
>
>
>
> Note: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and/or
> legally privileged information. Please do not forward any contents without
> permission. If you have received this message in error please destroy all
> copies, completely remove it from your computer, and notify the sender.
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________________
> IPAC-List
> IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list
>



-- 
Dennis Doverspike, PhD., ABPP
dennisdoverspike at gmail.com

The information is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential, privileged and/or a work product
for the sole use of the intended recipient. No confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any errant transmission. If you receive this message
in error, please destroy all copies of it and notify the sender. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. In the case of E-mail or electronic
transmission, immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system
and notify the sender. E-mail and fax transmission cannot be guaranteed to
be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/ipac-list/attachments/20180410/f8f5a5e7/attachment.html>