[Hackrf-dev] Mixer Conversion Loss

[Paul Connolly]

Since most of the signal path is the same I would say so.
https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/wiki/Hardware-Components#block-diagrams

On 03/12/2014 07:24, Ibrahim Basaran wrote:
> Yes, I'm talking RX not TX. 
> Does RX has the same limitation as TX?
>
> İbrahim BAŞARAN
>
> 3 Ara 2014 tarihinde 02:56 saatinde, Stefan Wagener
> <wageners at gmail.com <mailto:wageners at gmail.com>> şunları yazdı:
>
>> I am confused.
>>
>> I thought he was talking RX not TX.
>>
>> Stefan, VE4NSA
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Michael Ossmann <mike at ossmann.com
>> <mailto:mike at ossmann.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:49:38PM +0200, Ibrahim Basaran wrote:
>>     >
>>     > Starting from 2700MHz the signal strength gradually decreases.
>>
>>     That is expected.  See:
>>
>>     https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/wiki/HackRF-One#transmit-power
>>
>>     Mike
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     HackRF-dev mailing list
>>     HackRF-dev at greatscottgadgets.com
>>     <mailto:HackRF-dev at greatscottgadgets.com>
>>     https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev at greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/hackrf-dev/attachments/20141203/0610a1f8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/hackrf-dev/attachments/20141203/0610a1f8/attachment.pgp>