[IPAC-List] Does the day you take an oral exam matter? -Killingthe Mess...

Brull, Harry Harry.Brull at personneldecisions.com
Thu Apr 2 10:45:28 EDT 2009


I support Don's observations about orientation.
In my experience, "Tell them what you are going to do and do what you
told them" goes a long way.
I also make an audio or video tape of orientation for two purposes:
-access to those who were unable to make the orientation session
-documentation in case of later allegations
(I have never needed to use it for the later purpose)
Harry


Harry Brull
Senior Vice President
Personnel Decisions International-PDI Minneapolis
Expert Partners. Real Leadership Advantage.
Suite 4900
33 South sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Direct :612-337-8233 fax: 612-337-3695
harry.brull at personneldecisions.com

www.personneldecisions.com


-----Original Message-----
From: ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org
[mailto:ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org] On Behalf Of Don Nott
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 8:25 AM
To: RPClare at aol.com; dd1 at uakron.edu; ipac-list at ipacweb.org
Subject: Re: [IPAC-List] Does the day you take an oral exam matter?
-Killingthe Mess...

The interesting thing that I've found is that after we provide Candidate
orientation, some candidates express that they trust us (an outside
consulting firm) more than their own hierarchy! Transparency and
understanding is big component in alleviating candidate skepticism of
testing.

Perhaps it's basic psychology, but I'd love to see some data on
candidates' perceived testing experiences with, and without, candidate
orientation; my money is on that they would be significantly higher with
an orientation that helped the candidate's understanding of the process
and what to expect. The bottom line would be reducing the likelihood
and cost of grievances. The tricky part would be collecting the data
without social monitoring errors (i.e., I better say I liked it because
it might impact my results)

A couple more pennies to throw in the till.


:Don


-----------------------------------------------------
Donald M. Nott
I/O Associate

Fields Consulting Group
7926 Jones Branch Drive
McLean, VA 22102
(703) 506-9400

-----Original Message-----
From: ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org
[mailto:ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org] On Behalf Of RPClare at aol.com
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 9:14 AM
To: dd1 at uakron.edu; ipac-list at ipacweb.org
Subject: Re: [IPAC-List] Does the day you take an oral exam matter?
-Killing the Mess...

I have some interesting anecdotes including small # data on folks who,
through deception, took the same test twice and post test applicant
perception
that I never followed up on. I do want to chip in with two observations:
First, while police are special, I've had similar experiences with
Social
workers and accountant/auditors.
Second, while there is some distrust of testing, I believe it is more
about
how the results are manipulated and used rather than the testing itself.
While
cops usually don't trust non-cops to have much to do with their
selection/promotion, they also don't trust police command. That is a
major reason for
their drive (and Firefighters) to have contractual "rule of the list".
**************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for
$10 or
less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001)
_______________________________________________________
IPAC-List
IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list
_______________________________________________________
IPAC-List
IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list

Confidentiality Notice: All information in this communication, including any files or attachments, is intended for the sole use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or trade secret information entitled to protection and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete this communication from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.


More information about the IPAC-List mailing list