[IPAC-List] ADAAA regs

Jeff Feuquay jfeuquay at gmail.com
Fri Mar 25 17:43:43 EDT 2011

Bryan, et al.,

I'm not seeing anything stunning, although I would certainly encourage folks
to recognize that "business necessity" is not English, but a term of art.
There's some variation between circuits in how much deference is given to
the reasonable statements of employers. Need to read a couple cases from
one's own circuit.

Dr. Jeffrey P Feuquay, I/O Psychologist & Attorney
Managing Consultant, Psychology-Law Center, LLC
108 W. Walnut, Nevada, Mo 64772
ofc: 417-667-5076 cell: 417-549-0997

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Bryan Baldwin <Bryan.Baldwin at doj.ca.gov>wrote:

> Has anybody that's read the new ADAAA regs found anything that changes the

> scene when it comes to testing? Esp. section 1630.10(a)?

> http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/03/25/2011-6056/regulations-to-implement-the-equal-employment-provisions-of-the-americans-with-disabilities-act-as#h-112



> Bryan Baldwin

> Staff Services Manager II

> California Department of Justice

> Division of Administrative Support

> Personnel Programs

> (916) 322-5446



> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain

> confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use

> of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or

> disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the

> Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended

> recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the

> communication.

> _______________________________________________________

> IPAC-List

> IPAC-List at ipacweb.org

> http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list


More information about the IPAC-List mailing list