[IPAC-List] Changes to/Future of IPAC-List

RPClare at aol.com RPClare at aol.com
Wed Feb 20 09:19:48 EST 2013

I enjoy the list dynamic. Don't usually follow the LinkedIn

In a message dated 2/20/2013 6:38:18 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
richard.arwood at comcast.net writes:

I will say that although I rarely "open my mouth" here, I have thoroughly
enjoyed the comments and interaction that I have seen here. The IPAC
listserve provides for me an opportunity to freely interact with you, the
consultants, in areas that are very important to the fire service. I have found
no other source group to which I could turn with my questions, in which I
could quickly receive feedback and opinion. I hold a great respect for
this group, and I hope to see it continue.
Richard Arwood (Fire Chief-Retired: City of Memphis, TN)
--now residing in Collierville, TN
From: ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org [mailto:ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org]
On Behalf Of Bill Waldron
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 5:08 AM
To: IPAC-List
Subject: [IPAC-List] Changes to/Future of IPAC-List
As Deb Whetzel noted in the January ACN, we're in the process of creating
an improved IPAC website (pardon our dust!). As part of some
platform/hosting changes associated with that effort, IPAC-List has been impacted.

At first, I thought that we'd have to discontinue the list; however, it
looks like it will be able to survive with a few changes.

One change is to our list archive. We no longer can run all of the
back-end software that created our own message archive and provided a search
engine specifically for it. I'm not sure whether I'll be able to change that or
not. I'm now using the archiving system built into the listserv software
itself, which works fine -- just no built-in search.

On a more positive note, I've been able to increase the message size limit
for the list, and (reasonably sized) attachments to messages can now be
sent to the list.

Regarding the future of IPAC-List, I (and the IPAC Board) am interested in
your thoughts. We have seen membership and activity on the list decrease
over the years. Is it indeed worth keeping if possible, or is it redundant
with our LinkedIn group? What value does it provide to you?

Comments are welcomed...

Bill Waldron
IPAC web janitor
_elcomnet at ipacweb.org_ (mailto:elcomnet at ipacweb.org)

IPAC-List at ipacweb.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nine.pairlist.net/pipermail/ipac-list/attachments/20130220/66300611/attachment.htm>

More information about the IPAC-List mailing list