[IPAC-List] Experience Transitioning from Paper/Written Exams to Computer Based Testing (CBT) for Entry Level & Promotional Pre-Employment Testing

Patrick McCoy Patrick.McCoy at cfp-psc.gc.ca
Wed Dec 7 08:46:47 EST 2016


Nice list Kevin!
 
A few other potential cons
- Differences in computers (speed, screen size, graphic capabilities,
etc), which may or may not be a problem depending on the nature of the
test
- Differences in keyboards, with the result that candidates might be on
one that is different for them; That can be a problem in Canada, where
we have French, English, and I believe, International keyboards.
 
Pat McCoy,
Ottawa Canada
 


>>> "Reindl, Kevin" <K1RQ at pge.com> 2016/12/06 2:56 PM >>>

Hi Brandi, 
 
We transitioned from paper-based to computer-based testing a few years
back. However, we also moved from proctored to unproctored testing…so
not completely apples to apples. In any case, some of the pro’s and cons
are still applicable if you still plan to proctor. Just a few off the
top of my head include:
 
Pro’s
·		 Accuracy and Reliability - fewer errors (vs.
scanning/manual scoring)
·		 Efficiency – shortened cycle time from testing to
results (no manual scoring or scanning involved); results can be
instantaneous
·		 Security – all test content is maintained in system
rather than paper that can be “misplaced” (this assumes you have tight
controls in place for your electronic systems)
·		 Environmental – paper waste reduced
·		 Consistency – testing experience can be more
consistent, as you can build instructions, timing, etc. into the test
itself (rather than relying on test proctors to keep track)
·		 Improved reputation – this may be important to some
organizations (e.g., high tech company may lose credibility if still
using paper-based tests, but may not be as big of an issue for other
orgs?)
·		 Centralized content – all testing content is
centralized and easier to update, change, alternate forms, etc.
 
Con’s
·		 Higher costs – this may depend a lot on what systems
and hardware you use, but you may have to invest in more infrastructure
(computers, software, etc.) that can actually increase your costs
·		 Change management – may be a barrier for some who are
not used to using computers (probably less of an issue today)
·		 More I.T. support needed – you will need more support
for your test proctors if systems go down
·		 More vulnerable to hacking/software bugs/computer
crashing/etc.
·		 Testing locations are limited to those with computers
(this may not be as big of an issue if you are also web-based, since you
will not have to rely on local software to be loaded on computers).
Laptops/mobile devices may offer more flexibility.
 
Let me know if you have questions.
 

Kevin Reindl
Pacific Gas & Electric
Human Resources
Assessments and Organizational Insights
245 Market Street, N2J
San Francisco, CA 94105
Office: 415-973-7013
Mobile: 619-322-3368
k1rq at pge.com or kevin.reindl at pge.com

 

From: IPAC-List [mailto:ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org] On Behalf Of
Richmond, Brandi
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 7:09 AM
To: 'ipac-list at ipacweb.org'
Subject: [IPAC-List] Experience Transitioning from Paper/Written Exams
to Computer Based Testing (CBT) for Entry Level & Promotional
Pre-Employment Testing

 
This is an EXTERNAL EMAIL. Stop and think before clicking links or
opening attachments.
************************************* 

Good Day:
 
Have you transitioned from administering paper/written entry level and
promotional exams to Computer Based Testing (CBT)?  If yes, what were
some of the pro’s/con’s?
 
Thank you for your reply.
 
Brandi Richmond, SHRM-CP
Recruitment & Talent Acquisition Specialist III
City of Baltimore Department of Human Resources
 
 
 



Ce courriel est destiné exclusivement au destinataire mentionné en titre
et peut contenir de l'information privilégiée, confidentielle ou
soustraite à la communication aux termes des lois applicables. Toute
divulgation non autorisée, toute reproduction ou réacheminement est
interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce courriel, ou n'êtes
pas autorisé par le destinataire visé, ou encore, si vous l'avez reçu
par erreur, veuillez le mentionner immédiatement à l'expéditeur et
supprimer le courriel et les copies.  

This e-mail message is intended for the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or
re-transmission is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient or not
authorized by the named recipient(s), or if you have received this
e-mail in error, then please notify the sender immediately and delete
the message and any copies.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/ipac-list/attachments/20161207/a820512b/attachment.html>


More information about the IPAC-List mailing list