[IPAC-List] Question about US OPM's STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS: A PRACTICAL GUIDE (2008)

[Joel Wiesen]

Hello Lance,

What you write makes sense concerning scoring, but if all the selecting 
official is doing is confirming qualifications, why go thru the job 
analysis and question development steps?

Why is only step 4 noted as not applicable to the selecting official?

Thx.

Joel


P.S. Here are the 8 steps, from page 5 of the Guide:

1. Conduct a Job Analysis

2. Determine the Competencies to be Assessed by the Interview

3. Choose the Interview Format and Develop Questions

4. Develop Rating Scales to Evaluate Candidates

5. Create Interview Probes

6. Pilot-Test the Interview Questions

7. Create the Interviewer’s Guide

8. Document the Development Process


Joel P. Wiesen, Ph.D., Director
Applied Personnel Research
62 Candlewood Road
Scarsdale, NY 10583-6040
http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelwiesen
(617) 244-8859
http://appliedpersonnelresearch.com

Continuing Education website (home study of recent journal articles): https://www.aprtestingservice.com/


Note: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. Please do not forward any contents without permission. If you have received this message in error please destroy all copies, completely remove it from your computer, and notify the sender. Thank you.

On 1/28/20 11:26 AM, Lance Seberhagen wrote:
>
> The Introduction of OPM report (p. 3) says:
>
> /Interviews are typically used for one of two purposes in the Federal 
> Government. First, the interview may be used as part of the formal 
> selection process in which candidates are screened or ranked based on 
> their scores. Second, a “selecting official's interview” may be used 
> to verify candidates’ qualifications for a job after they have been 
> rated using other assessment methods, but prior to making a hiring 
> decision. In a selecting official’s interview, candidates’ responses 
> are typically not scored./
>
> The Selecting Official’s Interview is unstructured and more flexible 
> than the Screening Interview because the goal of the Selecting 
> Official is to identify the best qualified candidate from among a 
> small group of finalists who are likely to have relatively equal 
> qualifications.
>
>
> Lance Seberhagen, Ph.D.
> Seberhagen & Associates
> 9021 Trailridge Ct
> Vienna, VA 22182
> Tel 703-790-0796
> www.seberhagen.com <http://www.seberhagen.com>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IPAC-List <ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org> On Behalf Of Joel Wiesen
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 9:09 AM
> To: IPAC-List <IPAC-List at ipacweb.org>
> Subject: [IPAC-List] Question about US OPM's STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS: A 
> PRACTICAL GUIDE (2008)
>
> OPM's guide is here:
>
> https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/assessment-and-selection/structured-interviews/guide.pdf
>
> Page 8 says:
>
> << 4. Developing Rating Scales to Evaluate Candidates << NOTE: This 
> step is not applicable to a selecting official’s interview.
>
> My question is, why is this step not applicable to a selecting 
> official’s interview?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Joel
>
> --
>
> Joel P. Wiesen, Ph.D., Director
>
> Applied Personnel Research
>
> 62 Candlewood Road
>
> Scarsdale, NY 10583-6040
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelwiesen
>
> (617) 244-8859
>
> http://appliedpersonnelresearch.com
>
> Continuing Education website (home study of recent journal articles): 
> https://www.aprtestingservice.com/
>
> Note: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and/or 
> legally privileged information. Please do not forward any contents 
> without permission. If you have received this message in error please 
> destroy all copies, completely remove it from your computer, and 
> notify the sender. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________________
>
> IPAC-List
>
> IPAC-List at ipacweb.org <mailto:IPAC-List at ipacweb.org>
>
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list
>