[IPAC-List] Police Backgraund Removal Standards

Dennis Doverspike dennisdoverspike at gmail.com
Wed Oct 27 14:10:36 EDT 2021

This question deals with Police Background Removal Standards, especially
more discretionary or subjective ones. Does anyone know of articles,
literature, or even departments that have studied the use of more
subjective standards as compared to highly objective standards. A removal
standard could be subjective in one of two ways:

1. The standard in and of itself is objective, HAS A CREDIT RATING LESS
THAN 500, but the application of the removal standard is discretionary or
dependent upon the decision maker. So, at the discretion of the decision
maker, some applicants are removed for a score less than 500 but others are
not removed.

2. The standard in and of itself is subjective. For example, HAS A CREDIT
RATING LESS THAN 500, would be highly objective. But, HAS A POOR CREDIT

Dennis Doverspike, PhD., ABPP
dennisdoverspike at gmail.com
*Principled Progress Through People Science*

*Doverspike Consulting LLC:*

HR Litehouse (DBA)

Chief People Scientist


PO Box 1788

Stow, OH 44224-0788


Email: dennisdoverspike at gmail.com


Dennis Doverspike

3171 N. Dover Road

Silver Lake, Ohio 44224


dennisdoverspike at gmail.com <dennis_doverspike at yahoo.com>

The information is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential, privileged and/or a work product
for the sole use of the intended recipient. No confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any errant transmission. If you receive this message
in error, please destroy all copies of it and notify the sender. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. In the case of E-mail or electronic
transmission, immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system
and notify the sender. E-mail and fax transmission cannot be guaranteed to
be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/ipac-list/attachments/20211027/932252dc/attachment.htm>

More information about the IPAC-List mailing list