[IPAC-List] selection validation question
Dan Ispas
dispas at gmail.com
Thu May 28 16:10:05 EDT 2009
Megan,
I'm pretty sure the UG don't talk about validity generalization. A new job
analysis is a good idea, especially from a legal standpoint.
Dan
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 15:54, Blair, Michael D[EQ] <
Michael.D.Blair at embarq.com> wrote:
> Megan -
>
> Sounds to me like you're getting caught in the company's process, not the
> Uniform Guidelines. Assuming you have a sufficient sample size and good
> criterion measures, you do not need to do any other validation study. In
> fact, a local criterion-validity study is going to trump any other validity
> study 99% of the time. The consultant was correct concerning the job
> analysis. If the job analysis is out of date, then you need to update it,
> since it forms the foundation for the validity study. The job analysis will
> determine appropriate test content, appropriate criterion measures, and can
> also be useful in determining test weights, test model (e.g., compensatory
> vs. hurdle), etc. You're clearly concerned enough about the differences in
> the job then versus now that you want a new validation study. Logically, a
> new job analysis is also warranted.
>
>
> Michael D. Blair
> Manager, Recruitment, Selection & Assessment
> EMBARQ
> Voice: 913-345-6334 | Cell: 913-832-6130 | Fax: 913-345-6417
> Email: Michael.D.Blair at embarq.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/blairmichaeld
>
>
>
> This e-mail is the property of EMBARQ and may contain confidential and
> privileged material for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
> sender and delete all copies of the message.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org [mailto:ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org]
> On Behalf Of Megan Paul
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:04 PM
> To: IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
> Subject: [IPAC-List] selection validation question
>
> I am currently considering the use of a commercially available selection
> tool (vendor and tool shall rename nameless). An in-house criterion-related
> validation study was done on the test many years ago, but the test was never
> implemented. The job has since changed enough that I would not feel
> comfortable implementing the test on the basis of the old results.
>
> When I recently spoke with the one of the company's consultants and said
> that I wanted to do another criterion-related validity study, this time
> using their assistance with analyses, I was told that the research process
> needed to start with a job analysis and validity generalization research
> (both done by said company and requiring a significant amount of time on
> their part and my client's). The criterion-related validation is apparently
> considered a "follow-up" to all the other work. When I said I only wanted to
> do the criterion-related validation portion (a simple and quick concurrent
> validation), she told me that the company has to do the job analysis and
> validity generalization first, because "that's what the Uniform Guidelines
> require."
>
> There's a lot I could say here, but I will just start with a question.
> Reactions??
>
> --
> Megan E. Paul, Ph.D.
> Research Assistant Professor
> University of Nebraska-Lincoln
> Center on Children, Families, and the Law
> 206 S. 13th Street, Suite 1000
> Lincoln, NE 68588-0227
>
> (402) 472-9812 Office
> (402) 472-8412 Fax
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> IPAC-List
> IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
> http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> IPAC-List
> IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
> http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list
>
--
Dan Ispas, M.A., A.B.D.
Doctoral Candidate
Industrial/Organizational Psychology Program
University of South Florida
4202 E Fowler Ave PCD 4118G
Tampa, FL 33620
More information about the IPAC-List
mailing list