[IPAC-List] Adding bonus points to exam scores of city residents

Dennis Doverspike dd1 at uakron.edu
Tue Nov 3 22:44:46 EST 2009


As Jeff knows, I am not a lawyer. However, I am not sure it was made clear
that since 2006 Ohio has had a law that bans residency requirements. This
law was upheld in a June 2009 Supreme Court decision. As far as I know, the
law is still in place.

Now, not being a lawyer, I am not sure how a ban on a residency requirement
might impact or not impact the awarding of additional points for residency.
However, one could predict that for many large cities, where there are many
applicants especially for lower level and safety jobs, the awarding of
points for residency could well mean that only residents were hired. Thus,
the impact could be the same from a statistical standpoint as imposing a
residency requirement.

So Jeff, would there be a distinction between having a residency requirement
and awarding points for residency? Technically, it is not a strict
requirement.

Dennis Doverspike, Ph.D., ABPP
Professor of Psychology
Director, Center for Organizational Research
Senior Fellow of the Institute for Life-Span Development and Gerontology
Psychology Department
University of Akron
Akron, Ohio 44325-4301
330-972-8372 (Office)
330-972-5174 (Office Fax)
ddoverspike at uakron.edu

The information is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential, privileged and/or a work product for
the sole use of the intended recipient. No confidentiality or privilege is
waived or lost by any errant transmission. If you receive this message in
error, please destroy all copies of it and notify the sender. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. In the case of E-mail or electronic transmission, immediately
delete it and all copies of it from your system and notify the sender.
E-mail and fax transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late
or incomplete, or contain viruses.

-----Original Message-----
From: ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org [mailto:ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org]
On Behalf Of Jeff Feuquay
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 12:53 PM
To: Van Atta, Nancy
Cc: ipac-list at ipacweb.org
Subject: Re: [IPAC-List] Adding bonus points to exam scores of city
residents

Interesting idea. I'd be curious about the demographics of in-city vs
out-of-city applicants. If there are race/ethnicity differences, I would be
wary of the argument that Dayton is engaging in disparate treatment by
adjusting scores based on race/ethnicity. I'd sure want a LNDR for giving
the points, e.g., to encourage employees to live closer to work, be able to
articulate the business advantage/necessity, and show that there was no
better way to get it done. As an aside, if the bonus points are high enough,
would it not encourage folks to rent a by-the-week motel room and use that
address for test-taking?

Jeff Feuquay, Psychologist, Attorney, and Stuff

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Van Atta, Nancy <
Nancy.VanAtta at cityofdayton.org> wrote:


> The City of Dayton no longer has a residency requirement for City

> employees, but we are considering adding bonus points to exam scores of

> city residents. We would like to know who on the list is already doing

> this or knows of cities that are. We would also be interested in

> members' views of the pros and cons of awarding such points whether or

> not they are doing so themselves.

>

>

>

> Many thanks for all responses. Please indicate if you want your response

> to be anonymous and email me directly, if so.

>

>

>

> (Forgive me if this issue is discussed in an archive; currently our

> persnickety filter is blocking the parts of the IPAC site.)

>

>

>

> Nancy Van Atta

>

> Employment Analyst

>

> City of Dayton Civil Service Board

>

> nancy.vanatta at cityofdayton.org

>

> 937-333-2070

>

> 937-333-2125 (Fax)

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________________

> IPAC-List

> IPAC-List at ipacweb.org

> http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list

>




--
Jeff
-----------------------------------------
Dr. Jeffrey P Feuquay, Psychologist & Attorney
CPS Human Resource Services, Supernumerary
and Special Counsel to Russell, Brown & Breckenridge
108 W. Walnut, Nevada, Mo 64772
ofc: 417-667-5076 cell: 417-549-0997
_______________________________________________________
IPAC-List
IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list



More information about the IPAC-List mailing list