[IPAC-List] SME issue

[keith.poole at phoenix.gov]

For Police Sgt for example, we typically have about 6 to 8 involved in the 
written test development.  The last couple of recruitments we've also had 
a live tactical exercise with 'actors', script writers, etc., and I'm 
guessing that is at least 10 - 15 closely involved with that particular 
event.  But, most of the written test SMEs keep to that event and live 
tactical keep to that event, and other people do in-basket, and another 
couple prepare the oral board, so there are only a small number (maybe 2 - 
3  from HR and another 3 - 4 at Police) that have seen details (test 
questions, rating sheets, benchmarks, etc) on all the events.  We have 
about 3,000 sworn positions.

Keith Poole
Human Resources Supervisor
City of Phoenix Human Resources Dept
Employment Services
(602) 262-7140
keith.poole at phoenix.gov

"Phoenix - 2009 All-America City"



"Klus, Thomas M." <Thomas.Klus at fairfaxcounty.gov> 
Sent by: ipac-list-bounces at ipacweb.org
06/24/2011 05:21 AM

To
<ipac-list at ipacweb.org>
cc

Subject
[IPAC-List] SME issue






I have an issue that I hope to get some input on from other
practitioners.  To assist in exercise development, pilot testing and
content validation, our police department supplies Subject Matter
Experts from the target rank.  These SME's are paid for their time, and
they receive resume credit in their file for their participation.  The
department assigns a committee chair (from the managerial ranks) to
oversee the SME's, and the chair is allowed a great deal of latitude on
determining how many SME will participate.  That number has been
growing, and now it appears they would like to have up to 20 SME
participate in the current process development.  While I have raised
concerns about the efficiency and the potential for security issues
related to having such a large number of individuals intimately involved
in exercise development, I am getting considerable push back from the
department.    Our department has approximately 1400 sworn positions,
and in the current process, 20 SME's represent about 20% of the
incumbents in the target rank, and it is likely about 30% of the number
of potential applicants we will have in the process. From nearly any
perspective, it seems like an extremely excessive number.   I am
advocating we limit the numbers to 6-8, as in my experience, that is
sufficient.  However, since the top officials are more likely to be
influenced by what other departments do than simple logic and reason, I
would like to ask, what is your target number of SME's to have involved
in your promotional processes?  Any input would be appreciated.

 

Thomas Klus

Management Analyst III, Employment Div.

Department of Human Resources

Fairfax County Government

703-324-5808

 

_______________________________________________________
IPAC-List
IPAC-List at ipacweb.org
http://www.ipacweb.org/mailman/listinfo/ipac-list