[IPAC-List] promotional exam strategy
Winfred Arthur, Jr.
w-arthur at neo.tamu.edu
Wed Jun 29 12:21:21 EDT 2011
well, at one level it is really a test design and development issue,
right? specifically, if the exam [pool of 500 items] adequately samples
from and represents the content domain as defined, then by "studying the
exam", one would indeed be studying the content domain [i.e., they are
in effect one and the same]. that is indeed the sampling-based
definition of content-related validity, no?
- winfred
On 6/29/2011 7:58 AM, Glen Morry wrote:
> Hi Ramona -
> From a candidate's point of view it is reassuring to see all the
> potential questions that could be asked. Less test anxiety (and more
> focused preparation) might result in elevated exam scores, but I
> wonder if this "spoon-feeding" could disproportionately favour weaker
> candidates? Does one's actual exam score matter - i.e. are the results
> applied "top down", or is it just pass-fail? What's the overall pass
> rate and what proportion of candidates eventually get promoted...? I
> guess it is as much a matter of managing candidate pools (and
> candidate expectations) as it is a psychometric issue!
> If candidates had all the test items in hand, then most will just
> study to those, and disregard anything else (although 500 items is a
> lot to digest). At the RCMP we publish previous exams, and we find the
> same sort of thing - candidates overly rely on preparing to these
> questions, rather than to the actual content we want to test for. If
> the ultimate goal is to ensure that candidates know _all_ the
> P&P well, then a simpler strategy would be to just list the specific
> policies and procedures that will be covered by the exam.
> This involves a whole lot less work on your part, and arguably
> would produce similar benefits!
> Since this is essentially a generic province-wide promotional exam, do
> the participating police forces also supplement this with testing
> involving questions directly related to their own force's policies and
> procedures, municipal by-laws etc? If so, do they use the same
> testing strategy, with candidates using a question bank to prepare?
> Glen
> *Glen Morry
> *Senior Advisor, Executive Development
> Executive/Officer Development & Resourcing
> Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> 73 Leikin Drive,
> Building M4, room 606-13
> mailstop # 41
> Ottawa ON K1A 0R2
> (613) 843-6145 - tel.
> (613) 825-0529 - fax
More information about the IPAC-List
mailing list